Breaking: SBC Presidential Candidate’s Wife Preaches at his Church

Ed Litton, Pastor of Redemption Church (Saraland, AL), and considered one of the more progressive candidates running for the presidency of the Southern Baptist Convention, claims to have complementarian creds and that women do not preach at his church, despite it being revealed in a series of recently unearthed videos that his wife has on occasion preached tag-team sermons with him.

This, of course, is a sneaky and unbecoming practice, where the pastor will let a woman preach but stands on stage with them in order to give her his “authoritative covering.” It is nothing but semantic word games and is no different than Adam standing by and watching Eve take of the forbidden fruit.

This is what Ed Litton has done.

During his questionnaire for the Council of Biblical Manhood and Womanhood’s Candidate forum, though he said that “The only ministry the Bible limits to God-called and qualified men is the office of pastor, which is rightly designated by the title of pastor and elder,” he also specifically said that women do not preach from his pulpit: a revelation that is patently untrue.

4. Recently, there have been some publicized instances of women serving as the Sunday morning preacher in Southern Baptist churches. Do you think the Bible allows for women to serve in this role? Explain.

I think that our pulpits should be places that reflect our view of pastors. At Redemption church, we do not have women preach. However, we intentionally promote the significant ways that women can and do serve.

Let me say that I understand that some pastors have a different approach to who can speak when the church gathers for corporate worship, even if that’s not my approach, I respect their right and responsibility to lead their church as God has called them to do so.

Redemption Church absolutely allows women to preach. His wife has preached alongside him, and him being there doesn’t make it ok.

Watching one’s wife publicly go before the body and sin by preaching is a critical failure of headship and leadership, shows why Litton cannot be trusted, and is absolutely disqualifying from leading the convention.


Bringing you discernment news and commentary from a biblical, polemical perspective means it is tough out there on social media. We’re constantly getting kneecapped and constrained by tech companies who find our fidelity to the scripture and pursuit of truth to be intolerable, resulting in our reach being severely throttled.

For this reason, we ask you please consider supporting us a few different ways. The first, by liking and following our new Facebook page, our home where we share new posts and interact with our members. The second, by following and retweeting our Twitter page. The third, by signing up for our newsletter below.

And last, through direct support. You can catch our free weekly episodes of the Polemics Report by subscribing at BTWN. If you like what you hear and desire to hear more, you can get the VIP full-length version for only $5.95 per month on Patreon. Also, you get other freebies for additional monthly pledges.

Subscribe to us on Patreon here and support our ministry.

God bless!

Stay informed. Subscribe Today.

When you subscribe, please add to your contacts to ensure that your newsletter doesn’t go into your spam folder.

Enter your email address below…

5 thoughts on “Breaking: SBC Presidential Candidate’s Wife Preaches at his Church

  1. “…watching Eve take of the poisonous fruit”

    For the record, nothing in the Word of God says the fruit was poisonous. The problem was not with the fruit itself, but with the prohibition against eating it, which was transgressed. It was not “poisonous” fruit, but “forbidden” fruit.

  2. Complementarianism wouldn’t exist apart from semantic word games and yet it’s become the de facto belief for “conservative” Christians.
    This type “loophole” where it becomes ok for women to preach if she has the “authoritative covering” of the pastor isn’t unique and is a direct result of the exegetical shenanigans CBMW (Center for Biblical Manhood and Womanhood) sprinkle throughout their complementarian doctrine.

    If you don’t think complementarianism forces the Bible to accommodate feminist sensibilities I challenge you to read what Douglas Moo wrote in chapter 9 of “Recovering Biblical Manhood and Womanhood- A Response to Evangelical Feminism” and show me an example before that was written where conservative Christians believed the focus of 1 Timothy 2:11 was not whether or not a woman should preach but rather who they should preach to.

  3. I was waiting for her to announce that she is a transgendered male – could have been worse.

  4. “but stands on stage with them in order to give her his “authoritative covering.””

    after 40 years of biblical training and preaching the word, along with growing up in the church, I have not heard nor found in the bible that concept. it is an excuse to ignore biblical teaching and God’s will for the church

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *