The Gospel Coalition Urges Not to Celebrate, But to Empathize With Pro-Abortion Mothers Amid SCOTUS Decision
(The Dissenter) If you want to find the kind of luke-warm Christianity God detests—like the church in Sardis that God said he would vomit from his presence—look no further than The Gospel Coalition. Amid the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade which ended 50 years of the guaranteed right to murder innocent children in the womb, Evangelical leaders are urging Christians to temper their celebration.
For the last several years, Big Eva (the “Big Evangelical” industrial complex) leaders have spent the better part of their time trying to convince us that voting Democrat is a morally acceptable choice given the “fact” that conservatives “couldn’t do anything about abortion anyways.” Thankfully, that argument has been exposed for the fraudulent lie that it was and those trying to convince us of its truth now have nothing left to convince us that Republicans and Democrats are just the same.
So now they have one option left—try to convince us that overturning Roe v. Wade is not worth celebrating and that in the midst of this “terrible tragedy” for some women, we should empathize with them and “understand their pain.”
In The Gospel Coalition’s latest attempt at derailing your biblical worldview, in an article titled After Roe, Choose Compassion over Culture War, the author starts out by recalling when, as a teenager, he and his girlfriend found out that she was pregnant, and recalling the fear and uncertainty they faced at the time. The author then recalled being offered a “way out” by the doctor, and from there, he jumps into a diatribe against Christians who celebrate life.
Playing on the emotions of the weaker vessel (1 Peter 3:7), the author, James Forsyth, attempts to convince us that it is normal for scared women, teenagers, and those in uncomfortable and unprepared situations to see abortion as a viable option to an unexpected pregnancy. And this is where Forsyth calls on Christians not to celebrate the fact that
To continue reading, click here:
Editor’s note. This article was written by Jeff Maples and published at The Dissenter.
About Author
The “fear of God” has been replaced by “the fear of women”. How the two sides view abortion is illustrated by the words they choose to identify themselves. One side focuses on protecting life and the other side focuses on control hence the labels “pro-life” and “pro-choice”.
The problem that pro-lifers are running into is how absolutely petrified they are to come out and say “we want to control women and restrict certain behaviors” despite the fact that at some level that is exactly what they want to do. No, it’s not their primary motivation, which is to preserve human life made in the image of God, but it’s kind of dishonest to pretend like control isn’t a means to an end.
Pro-lifers need to come to terms with the fact that it’s OK to be anti-choice and stop fearing the feminist temper tantrum that inevitably ensues after a woman is told “NO”.
There are laws ( consequences) that control society so that individuals do not get away with murdering another human being UNLESS the human being is in the womb!
I think we need to start putting those in place now for men and women who premeditate murder for their own offspring. Btw; I dont know where you get your opinion that pro lifers are petrified to tell the truth. I think that you have bought into the screaming feminism rhetoric. Irresponsible promiscuous women ( and men) ( it takes two) who want to murder their babies are the ones who want to commit murder and control whether a life continues or dies. They are the ones who want total CONTROL even if it is their evil means of birth control. They have many options except one and that is to take the life of their own offspring. They can abstain, put baby up for adoption, become a mother and father, or use contraception or protection to keep from creating a life in the first place. Dont buy into their talking point. Throw it back at them! A sane polite society keeps people from using abortion as birth control. Abortion went from being necessary rarely to “abortion is a right to murder my own child”.
The murderer is always restrained from murdering in a nation where law and order is put in place. It doesnt matter how that murder is carried out. Murder is amoral and NOW it should be against the law in all 50 states. I have never been pro life btw. I have always been an abolitionist . Personhood begins at conception with our own genetic code that determines everything about what we will look like as a child and even an adult! Those that think it is okay to murder “up to a certain week” are AGISTS! They discriminate against millions of children who would have likewise lived. Taking the life of another human being created in the image of God should always be rare and only in cases where the moms or babies health are at risk.
HOME-BASED real Earner.I am just working on facebook only 3 to 4 hours a Day and earning $47786 a month easily, that is handsome earning to meet my extra expenses and that is really life changing opportunity. zx31~ Let me give you a little insight into what I do…..
FOR More Details……….. >> http://joinwork44.blogspot.com
I fought the Taliban in the Middle East and I will fight the Christian Taliban in the USA 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
Then you are fighting against God. Just keep that in mind. You are in the death cult. You will be held accountable unless you repent and turn from your wicked ways.
The Nazis also took away Jewish rights! As a Jew my religion gives the right of abortion. You are an anti-Semite. You should stand with Jewish people not be a Christian Taliban.
Your name says it all. Boy oh boy. You called her an anti-semite but she is right. You will pay for your rebellion and outright denial of the only one and true living God. You need to get your head of the zionism sand and read your Bible. You are truly deceived.
Where does the sacred literature of Judaism give the right to abort babies?
“ In Jewish law, a fetus attains the status of a full person only at birth. Sources in the Talmud indicate that prior to 40 days of gestation, the fetus has an even more limited legal status, with one Talmudic authority (Yevamot 69b) asserting that prior to 40 days the fetus is “mere water.” Elsewhere, the Talmud indicates that the ancient rabbis regarded a fetus as part of its mother throughout the pregnancy, dependent fully on her for its life — a view that echoes the position that women should be free to make decisions concerning their own bodies.”