David French Says To Stop Calling the Chemical Castration of Children ‘Abusive’

‘David French, who we like to unaffectionately call “The State’s Fool“, is a self-proclaimed “conservative” Christian commentator who could be called a conservative in the same sense that Arius of Alexandria is called a “Church Father.’ He would be unknown in evangelical circles if Russell Moore hadn’t platformed and promoted him over the last decade, and therefore functions as controlled opposition, laying out progressive talking points in the guise of conservative concern that should sicken anyone with an ounce of discernment.   

In a recent article, he argues that political defeat ought not to result in the loss of “the most fundamental human rights of dissenting citizens and that “culture war waged against the civil liberties of your political opponents inflicts a double injury on dissenters: They don’t merely lose a vote; they also lose a share of their freedom.” 

He gives some examples of those losses of freedom, which he believes are two sides of the same coin. First, he criticizes schools for hiding information about gender-transition kids from parents. Once the guard is down with that minor acknowledgment, he splits his knuckles backhanding folk seeking to make it illegal to mutilate children through the chopping off of healthy breasts in young girls, pumping them full of hormones, and then enacting upon them nightmare surgeries that turn their reproductive systems into cruel and grotesque approximations of a penis. 

French suggests that helping a child ‘transition’ into a different gender are not necessarily abusive, and we ought not to presume they are.

He also argues we should not pass laws preventing parents from giving their children the same drugs used to chemically castrate sex offenders or inverting their children’s penis into a perpetually mangled and gnarled canal, because this would be an example of “state interference with parental authority” and a loss of the parent’s fundamental freedom. 

State attacks on civil liberties are even affecting our most valued relationships: the bonds between parent and child. In January, The Times reported on how public schools sometimes withhold from parents information about a child’s gender transition, even in the absence of any evidence of parental abuse.

….And because every culture war action against civil liberties has its mirror image on the other side, Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas issued a directive to the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services to investigate as “abuse” both surgical and pharmaceutical interventions for transgender children, regardless of the good faith and desires of the parents, children and caregivers involved.

To understand the gravity of the state interference with parental authority, it’s worth remembering the words of Chief Justice Warren Burger in the 1972 case Wisconsin v. Yoder, in which he wrote that the “primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition.” To simply presume that parents are abusive because they may dissent from state consensus on transgender care is to violate this principle of American law.

Lest you think French couldn’t be any more compromised after his insistence that we do not call these practices against children “abusive” or seek to pass laws against them, it’s clear he’s already absorbed the language and framework of gender ideology and argumentation, buying into the big lie.

The first indication is his inclusion of “caregivers” as people who might have a legitimate interest in a child’s transitioning, as if a teacher should have any involvement or say in seeing her pupil’s outsides turned into insides.

The second is his capitulation to the very existence of “transgender care,” which is an oxymoronic term used exclusively by morons high on oxy and given over the arguments of this wicked culture. Any efforts to “help” a child’s “transition” is not care but rather a farcical attempt to put a kind veneer over a garish maiming and disfigurement.

Like we said, the State’s Fool.



About Author

Appreciate our content? Take a second to join the fight with Protestia on Patreon!
Become a patron at Patreon!

20 thoughts on “David French Says To Stop Calling the Chemical Castration of Children ‘Abusive’

  1. “Abusive” really is too tame a word. Most forms of abuse leave the victim with some hope of eventual recovery. This is reminiscent to lobotomy, or involuntary sterilization. This is a degree of wanton cruelty which needs a much stronger term.

    To knowingly groom a child into the trans subculture, rob him or her of both primary and secondary sex characteristics and fertility, and then abandon the victim to fate? This is a dystopian horror barely short of murder. We may need a new word.

  2. It’s torure and murder. These pubery blocker chemicals cause permanent damage and loss of bone density as well as uncontrollable depression with forty percent risk of suicide. Take this clown to the woodshed!

  3. Didn’t these same people object to Chemical Castration of convicted pedophiles and rapist and call it ‘Abusive’?

  4. These psychopaths will literally disappear if you morons would stop giving their moronic beliefs coverage, as if what he says has any bearing on anything. In your screed you imply that he may actually have clout.

    YOU GIVE HIM THAT CLOUT YOU FRIGGIN MORONS. STOP IT l!!!!!

    1. Exposing religious leaders’ unbiblical beliefs and sins to the world is hardly ‘giving clout.’
      Bravo, Protestia – keep up the good work : )

  5. Sin is not an exercise of liberty. It is enslavement.

    French tries to appeal to the God given right of liberty, and to the God-instituted role and responsibility of parents, while rejecting boundaries which God put into place. That’s not how it works. God has not endowed anyone with the right to act outside of boundaries which He put into place. A right is something that has God’s permission and blessing. And that includes the God-given right of liberty. Rights are not the same thing as free will.

  6. French is a pedo Bush loving ho-mo. He’s a cross-dressing Nambla degenerate… a true disgrace who should be in prison.

  7. To claim to be a follower of Christ, David French sure has distain for the words of Christ, and yes, the Old Testament is the words of Christ according to Christ himself, as well as Christ’s admonition that it would be better that a millstone be hung around the neck of one who hurts a child, and that person be thrown into the sea — are you listening David French? Mutilating children is a pagan sacrifice to a false god, and yet French recommends that we not condemn sacrificing our children to Molech. Adopting pagan culture is what got Israel banished into captivity. If David French is not excommunicated from his, “conservative,” church, then the denomination should excommunicate the whole church, because they are demonic. I’ve always suspected that French is a wolf, sent by his master to deceive the sheep, and who will be cast into the lake of fire at the final judgement. May God have mercy on this deceiver’s soul.

  8. This nonsense needs to be stopped. It’s very simple to do. Make it illegal for anyone not of the current established legal age to be eligible for any of this. We can stop it as a group if we’re united.

  9. David French cares more about the Constitution and case law than the does the Scriptures (or our children).

    I used to think he was simply a confused, erring brother, but I don’t even think he’s my brother, anymore.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Blocker Image Powered by Code Help Pro

Ad Blocker Detected

We have detected that you are using extensions to block ads. Please support us by disabling your ad blocker, or subscribe on Patreon to read ad-free!