Categories
Coronavirus Evangelical Stuff Op-Ed

Why I’m Not Taking the COVID-19 Vaccine: A Layman Responds

Recently, The Reverend (ahem) Russell Moore was interviewed by John Yang on PBS News Hour, where Moore explained that evangelical hesitance to get the COVID-19 vaccine was based on ignorance and selfishness, not on religious or scientific convictions.

A few days later, megachurch pastor James Emery White described himself as “deeply disturbed” by the fact that approximately 45% of self-described white evangelicals in the United States are reportedly not interested in receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

In the PBS interview with Russell Moore, Yang quoted an evangelical named Billy Bryan from Nashville who said the following:

My real hesitancy, though, is, I just don’t really want to see the government or anybody force people to do something that those people feel like is not in their best interests.

Again, if people are comfortable with it, I think the more the merrier. But it does seem like a logical decision to hold off, at least to me individually, at this time.

It should not be missed that the logical abilities, ethical principles, and indeed the spiritual maturity of Bryan seriously exceeds what is demonstrated here by either Russell Moore or James Emery White. Bryan rightly notes that it is wrong for believers to support the government’s encroachment upon the bodily autonomy and personal freedom of fellow image-bearers (see Romans 12:1 and Mark 12:17). This encroachment is not justifiable under the biblical exhortation to love our neighbors. Bryan then appeals to the freedom of the individual to make medical decisions for themselves and their families and finishes with his personal, logical conclusion that he can and should hold off.

Why might Bryan have reached this conclusion? According to Russell Moore, it must be that he is scared and needs to see his neighbors getting the vaccine so he knows it’s safe. Moore also insists that simpleton Christians like Bryan need to realize that the vaccine is the pathway to the government giving us back our God-given freedoms of worship and association, and makes sure to reiterate his scientific bona fides by citing his webinar appearance with “fervent Christian” and theistic evolutionist Francis Collins of the National Institutes of Health.

James Emery White places the blame for evangelical vaccine hesitancy on ignorance and misinformation, listing eighteen strawman arguments in an effort to label regular believers as tin foil hat crazies, including our supposed belief that the vaccine contains aborted tissue, it is the mark of the beast, the virus is a hoax, and (most offensively) he bastardizes our belief in the sovereignty of God, claiming some of us say, “If God wants me to die, I’ll die. It’s all predetermined” as if this is evidence that Bible-believing Christians are too stupid to exercise reasonable precaution.

I can’t speak for every Christian deciding not to get a COVID-19 vaccination. Frankly, I trust the ministry of the Spirit in their lives to inform the decisions they make for themselves and their families, and I believe they have God-given freedom of conscience to make medical decisions. But here are my principled and scientific reasons for not getting a COVID-19 vaccine:

First, I accept the universally understood fact that everyone will come into contact with the novel coronavirus (remember flattening the curve?) and the overwhelming majority will have little to no problem defeating it on their own. Natural defense against the virus (and thus, herd immunity) is developed through spread and the development of antibodies, T cell immunity, and memory B cells within individual immune systems.

Second, asymptomatic infections and those who have defeated the virus don’t spread the disease. Not only is this Germ Theory 101, but it has also been specifically demonstrated as true with COVID-19 by scientific studies like this one showing the nonexistence of asymptomatic spread and admissions by groups like the WHO that have admitted the same.

Third, the infection fatality rate is no higher (and possibly far lower) than the seasonal flu. Contrary to fear mongers claiming that the novel coronavirus is ten times deadlier than the seasonal flu, careful examination of the data and the use of a proper epidemiological framework (making sure to use infection fatality rate versus case fatality rate consistently) demonstrates that the novel coronavirus did not increase death from all causes, and instead “borrowed” deaths from other causes either by claiming the lives of those with comorbidities or by being given credit for their deaths.

Combining these truths leads me to understand that the need (or my community’s need) for me to get a vaccine for the novel coronavirus is virtually nonexistent. This determination stands in stark opposition to evangelical “leaders” like Russell Moore and James Emery White who continue to push verifiable falsehoods like the existence of asymptomatic spread, the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions (lockdowns, masks, social distancing), and the idea that herd immunity (and the government’s return of our God-given freedoms) can only be achieved through mass vaccination. These men and their ilk continue to parrot the ever-changing narratives pushed by institutional liars like Anthony Fauci and his government handlers, and shame Christians who dare to think and act as free people.

Why are evangelical elites doing this? Yes, they could simply be woefully ignorant. But it is more likely that their capitulation on this issue is for the same simple reasons they capitulate to the world on so many other things: pragmatism, cowardice, and (in the end) hatred for God and scorn for His people. Much like the Pharisaism exposed by Jesus in Matthew 23, these men desire to be respected by the world, and one of the ways they do this is by “[tying] up heavy burdens and lay them on men’s shoulders,” such as turning the choice to receive a COVID-19 vaccine into morally-binding legality for Christians.

I want to make clear that I am not against the technology of vaccines. Contrary to the caricature of regular pew-sitters like myself being ignorant, prone to conspiracy, and reflexively distrustful of authority, we simply trust the Word of God as sufficient and use our God-given ability to reason, freedom of conscience under the principle of Christian liberty, and God’s gift of general revelation to come to our own conclusion. In my case (as a healthy 40-year-old who has recovered from COVID-19), there is no logical reason to get the vaccine. You might make a different decision. It is certainly not a sin either way. But it is a sin to ascribe this choice the weight of biblical legality, judge the heart of other believers, or bear false witness against those who have made a principled decision that is different than yours.

Categories
Church Evangelical Stuff SBC

Birds of a Feather: Karen Swallow Prior Defends Beth Moore, Slanders the Church

In an op-ed published at Religion News Service, SEBTS professor, notorious functional egalitarian, and suspected witch Karen Swallow Prior blamed the Southern Baptist Convention (her denomination) for “leaving women to fend for themselves” and basically forcing Beth Moore to leave rather than see Moore’s ministerial ambitions stifled.

If this was true, it would be high praise for a denomination that in reality had slid into functional egalitarianism.

Prior goes on to describe how much she related to Beth Moore despite how Prior (wisely) avoided institutional women’s ministry like the plague while Beth Moore was its figurehead. Prior turns her guns on Beth Moore’s “vitriolic” critics (you know, the biblically-literate Christians who remain in SBC pews), describing us as being more focused on Moore’s “mannerisms, her hair, her very femininity” and “[binding] the feet of women” by “banishing women to the drawing room” while we had our “table talk and cigars.” It’s the patriarchy, of course.

Au contraire. We regular, pew-sitting, non-seminary-educated Southern Baptist men (and our biblically-faithful wives) correctly rejected Beth Moore because she is a false teacher who is blatantly leading women away from the truth (2 Timothy 3:6). We love our wives and families too much to let someone like Moore (or her defender Karen Swallow Prior) usurp the biblical role of husbands in our congregations. Beth Moore claims to hear direct revelation from God, she defiantly preaches to and teaches men, and associates with known heretics and enemies of the church (see this article for all the details).

Much like every other biblically-illiterate egalitarian in the Southern Baptist Convention’s elite class, Karen Swallow Prior fails to return to scripture to find the plain and simple instructions given to the church that guide the roles of men and women, teachers and learners (1 Corinthians 14:33-35, 1 Timothy 2:11-14), and instead continues to ask worldly questions like, “Will the door swing further open or more closed for women in the church moving forward?”

The Baptist Faith and Message, while explicitly prohibiting female “pastors,” does not go far enough and makes no mention of the proper place of men and women within church ministry – which is for men to accept the mantle of teaching scripture (2 Timothy 2:24), and for women to learn in submission under the care and authority of their husbands (1 Corinthians 14:35). Far too many SBC churches have women acting in the role of functional elder or pastor while dodging proper biblical critique by referring to these women as “directors,” or “leaders,” or “co-pastors” alongside their clearly emasculated pastor husbands.

Seminaries that long ago usurped the doctrinal teaching role from the church, led by the likes of race-obsessed simpleton Danny Akin, are perfectly fine with women taking the spiritual leadership and shepherding role away from their husbands and inverting God’s created order (Genesis 3:16) for the sake of capitulation to the world. This downgrade has resulted in a theologically lukewarm SBC where the majority of Southern Baptists are open to women pastors and preachers and Critical Race Theory is celebrated in the halls of Southern Baptist academia.

Faithful believers and churches must (in the process of continually reforming) ask themselves: Considering the Word of God proclaims one Gospel, one faith and message (Jude 1:3) to all people (Galatians 3:28), and the Bible outlines teaching and learning in the church in accordance with the created order, what is the true purpose (and indeed, true risk) of gender-segregated ministries? Is it not to divide the family and eventually the Body of Christ against itself? There is no better example of the fruit of this thinking than the rise and fall of Beth Moore.

After calling for more women teachers, Prior ironically ends her article with a swipe against gender-segregated ministry: “Women in the church don’t need a room of their own as much as the church needs both women and men in the room.” On this point, I agree. Women need to be in the room learning under the guidance and shepherding of their husbands (1 Corinthians 14:35). Men and women are designed to grow together in discipleship, in accordance with God’s created order as revealed in the Word.

False teachers like Beth Moore and Karen Swallow Prior for too long have ignored the Word of God’s clear proclamations regarding men and women in the church (and by extension the family), and have led the Southern Baptist Convention downhill to the point where the denomination may not be salvageable.

*Note: For a comprehensive critique of Beth Moore and her disqualification for ministry, check out Seth Dunn’s book So Long, Beth Moore: You’ve Been a Bad Friend To Us.

Categories
Church Evangelical Stuff Heresies podcast Polemics Report SBC

Podcast: Snake Orgies, Empathy, and Hangin’ on “The Block”

On this episode of Polemics Report for March 16th, 2021, JD talks about Tim Keller blaming conservative evangelicals for their inevitable removal from the public arena, Russell Moore falling all over himself to defend Beth Moore, Tim Keller, and Rick Warren, and Kyle J. Howard’s ridiculously white recalling of hanging out on “the block.” In the patrons-only portion, JD and David discuss Gentle and Lowly, and JD answers questions from patrons.

To listen to the free, truncated version, click below.

To listen to the full program, support us on Patreon for only $5.95 a month for this and every other full-length, subscriber-only podcast from the #1 Polemics Organization in the world. Not a bad deal, right? Click here to join.

Categories
Church Evangelical Stuff

Grace to You Exposes Evangelicalism’s Gentle and Lowly Soft Underbelly

Dane Ortlund, senior pastor of Naperville Presbyterian Church and son of woke Gospel Coalition contributor Ray Ortund (who famously told Christians to read the Koran after the Bible), released his book Gentle and Lowly in April of 2020 to near-universal acclaim and it became (at least in evangelical circles) a runaway bestseller. Churches gobbled up copies for study as weary Christians responded to the book’s premise of showing its readers the true heart of Christ.

It earned the accolades and praises of doctrinal stalwarts like Russell Moore, the always manly Paul David Tripp, and “no way he’s still gay” Sam Allberry on top of being named the Gospel Coalition’s “Popular Theology” book of the year.

Yet even with this clearly solid list of endorsements, something was amiss. It took a comprehensive, theological, and critical review from the editors at Grace to You to expose the book’s theological and Christological imbalances, but most tellingly it exposed (once again) the doctrinal and dispositional softness of modern evangelicalism.

Soft and effeminate evangelicals were aghast that the team at Grace to You (long the sworn enemies of woke evangelicalism) would dare to criticize such a tender and empathetic take on the person of Christ. The book was (ironically) given away at the 2020 Shepherd’s Conference, but upon a closer read merited a more in-depth analysis by Jeremiah Johnson and the Grace to You team.

While scripture is clear about Christ’s gentle and lowly heart (Matthew 11:29), Ortlund’s book characterizes gentleness and lowliness as the primary and defining characteristics of Jesus, writing on page 18 that this verse is “the one place in the Bible where the Son of God pulls back the veil and lets us peer way down into the core of who he is.” Of course, orthodox Christianity understands the entire revealed Word of God to be a revelation of who He is, and the divine simplicity of God to mean that all of His attributes work together to comprise His holiness. Simply, one characteristic does not outweigh the others – Christ’s sword is not tempered by his gentleness, nor is God internally conflicted as Ortlund seems to teach on page 40 – “Mercy is natural to him. Punishment is unnatural.”

Most ridiculously, the very premise of the book is that the modern church is beset by a scourge of Christians who hold a view of God that is too judgmental and holy. That is, if only Christians could understand how Jesus “feel[s] about his people amid all their sins and failures” (book description), we might stop “suspect[ing] that we have deeply disappointed Him” or that we have “permanently diminished our usefulness to the Lord” (from the book’s introduction). Both of the aforementioned feelings are sinful for the Christian, for the record.

Instead, the modern church is infected by a Christianity that does not take God’s judgment and righteousness seriously enough. It is not that our view of God is not gentle and lowly enough, it is that our view of God is not holy enough. We don’t take Christ’s hatred for sin seriously enough. The reason Christians flocked to the comforting arms of Gentle and Lowly‘s premise is the exact same reason we flock to seeker-sensitive ministries that feed us what we want to hear and teachers who seem to compete for who can best soften and equivocate the Gospel so as not to offend anyone. Ortlund’s Gospel “presentation” in the book follows the same man-focused pattern, as revealed in Grace to You’s critique:

Nowhere is the danger of his imprecision more evident than in Ortlund’s discussion of the gospel. He writes, “Here is the promise of the gospel and the message of the whole Bible: In Jesus Christ, we are given a friend who will always enjoy rather than refuse our presence” (p. 115). Elsewhere he argues, “If the actions of Jesus are reflective of who he most deeply is, we cannot avoid the conclusion that it is the very fallenness which he came to undo that is most irresistibly attractive to him” (p. 30). You read that right—Ortlund says your sin is what makes you most attractive to your holy Savior. Put another way, “It is not our loveliness that wins his love. It is our unloveliness” (p. 75).

In the same way we are being fooled into navigating by feelings and accepting them as automatically valid (you know, empathy) despite the clear teaching of Jeremiah 17:9, we are being told that the church needs a softer understanding of the character of Christ, and there are plenty of beaten-down, feckless Christian leaders anxious to be self-affirmed by this characterization. The premise (and indeed the book itself) affirms what so many Christians want to hear: Jesus is a soft, emotional crier just like them. If Christ has to fight, he fights with the feelz.

While there are plenty of examples on Twitter of “gentle and lowly” Christian leaders responding to Grace to You’s critique without the (admittedly subjective) gentleness and lowliness they demand from others, perhaps the best example of the kind of softness the critique exposed comes from none other than Ray Ortlund, who will apparently mute critical voices on Twitter because he needs “uplifting” voices in his life (not Bereans or discerners, of course):

*Note: A prior version of this article mentioned Rosaria Butterfield in the opening paragraph, insinuating she was still a feminist. Recent developments have made me uncomfortable using that label for her, so the reference has been removed.

Categories
podcast Polemics Report

Podcast: Does Jordan Peterson Know He Needs Jesus?

On this episode of Polemics Report for March 11th, 2021, JD is moved by signs that Jordan Peterson may be being drawn to a true faith in Christ. In the patrons-only portion, he talks about Milo Yiannopoulos revealing that homosexuality is indeed a choice, a little more Beth Moore, and David discusses how tech censorship of conservatives is harming liberal publications as well.

To listen to the free, truncated version, click below.

To listen to the full program, support us on Patreon for only $5.95 a month for this and every other full-length, subscriber-only podcast from the #1 Polemics Organization in the world. Not a bad deal, right? Click here to join.

Categories
Church Coronavirus Evangelical Stuff LGBTQQIP2SAA podcast Polemics Report SBC Videos

Podcast: Beth Moore Finally Goes Home

On this episode of Polemics Report for March 9th, 2021, JD talks about the blessing of Beth Moore finally leaving the SBC and evangelical elites like David French and Russell Moore throwing faithful believers under the bus for being skeptical of the vaccine. In the patrons-only portion, JD discusses the latest instance of JD Greear mocking the Word and Southern Baptists who insist on biblical orthodoxy.

To listen to the free, truncated version, click below.

To listen to the full program, support us on Patreon for only $5.95 a month for this and every other full-length, subscriber-only podcast from the #1 Polemics Organization in the world. Not a bad deal, right? Click here to join.

Categories
Church News

Russell Moore, Son of the Devil

Russell Moore is nothing if not predictable. Moore has never been one to pass up an opportunity to slander and deride the bride of Christ. We can further add his record of standing silently while the world attacks the church. But the trifecta comes with his efforts to elevate himself at the expense of actual Christians, solidifying his position as a false prophet – little more than a court jester for secular elites by claiming to speak for God when he clearly does not know Him.

A recent interview with the Christian Post cited an earlier Time magazine article where Moore claimed, “I don’t know a single family that’s not been divided over President Trump, and politics generally. I don’t know a single church that hasn’t been”. This son of the Devil followed this by claiming that “the church” needs to “recover the credibility of our witness“. One cannot help but speculate that this is due to their unwilling to support the baby-murderer currently residing in the White House.

Why? Because Russell Moore and his ilk are pariahs to faithful Christian families and churches. Simply put, Moore only hangs out with unfaithful, morally (or spiritually) bankrupt people like Al Mohler, Matthew Hall, or the “take the money and run” shakedown-clown Dwight McKissic. These chuckleheads are divided over Trump, Critical Race Theory, and the coronavirus-based persecution of the church because (like other unregenerate souls) of their inability to correctly divide and apply the Word of God (2 Timothy 2:15) as it speaks into the issues of the day.

Faithful Christians – under the ministry of the Holy Spirit – rightly understand that there is no comparison between the Trump and Biden platforms. One employs a crass, sinful man who happens to have actively and provably supported free speech and religious liberty, protected unborn life and the biblical understanding of biological gender, and advanced policies that left more money in the pockets of Americans to be used as our consciences and beliefs dictate. The other candidate – now “president” – leads a political party that loves what God hates and hates what God loves. And they have a good and faithful servant in lifelong Democrat and fake Christian Russell Moore.

Continuing to (inexplicably) lead the mislabeled Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, this poster child for 2 Timothy 3:5 has done nothing but advocate for abject wickedness concerning the religious liberty issue of our day, claiming repeatedly that the Church of Jesus must prostrate itself before God-hating worldly rulers and lock the faithful out of church. He has continually slandered faithful Christians who happen to understand that a vote for Donald Trump – while not ideal – was the only moral option for believers in the 2020 election.

97% of Spiritually Active Governance-Engaged Conservative Christians voted for Donald Trump, which means over 22 million Americans are more qualified to lead the ERLC than Russell Moore!

In continuing to employ this servant of the devil, the SBC continues its woeful theological ineptitude, moral cowardice, and spiritual blindness as it continues to slide deeper into spiritual destruction, rank heresy and (ironically considering its apparent goals) cultural irrelevance. If you are a member of an SBC church, you must understand that your cooperative dollars are (sadly) being used to platform Moore and false teachers like him.

Categories
Church Coronavirus Religion

Julie Roys Beclowns Herself Going After John MacArthur (Again)

I hesitated to even write this article, lest we continue to increase attention for what Phil Johnson so accurately called “scandalmongering twaddle.” The start of this was covered last week, but many of the following points can’t be made often enough.

Julie Roys, the long-discredited pal of conservative stalwarts (ahem) like Karen Swallow Prior and Wade Burleson, launched a fresh attack on John MacArthur and Grace Community Church for daring to not report their church members’ prayer requests and private medical information to the state.

Apparently given a copy of a prayer request list from the Sojourner’s Fellowship Group at GCC (which contained health-related prayer requests – some regarding COVID-19), Roys gleefully rushed to her keyboard to express her outrage for the church (or its members) not sending a report of their prayer requests to the government:

A document obtained by The Roys Report shows John MacArthur’s Grace Community Church (GCC) last week knew of at least a dozen people in one of its fellowship groups with COVID-19.

However, there’s no evidence these cases were reported to local public health officials. This, despite an order requiring churches to report when at least three coronavirus cases are identified among a church staff or congregation within a 14-day span.

Roys’ blog has published a multitude of articles chronicling Dr. MacArthur and GCC’s “defiance” and “mocking of distancing and masks” (for the record, masks and distancing don’t work). She took a swipe at MacArthur back in March because a 90-year-old passed away after attending ShepCon and was later confirmed to have been exposed to the novel coronavirus. Apparently, GCC’s warning to attendees that they might have been exposed came a couple of days too late for Roys’ preference.

Her website publishes articles that are uncritically accepting of the government narrative on the so-called coronavirus pandemic – the same government that has lied continuously since the beginning of the virus and trampled the civil rights of Christians and non-Christians alike. She has been supportive of the “God isn’t bound to location” idea that is fine with so-called “online church.”

Let’s be clear about what Julie Roys is advocating. She believes God calls the church to lock believers out when the government says to, and on the off chance that the church gets the government to abide by the first amendment of the Constitution, the church should subject its members’ prayer requests and private medical information to the government.

News to Julie: The Church of Jesus Christ is not called to be the Gestapo for Gavin Newsom or any other would-be Caesar. Submission to governing authorities does not involve submitting our worship practices for their approval. A prayer list is neither proof of dangerous coronavirus spread nor evidence of a crime. We have one King, and He did not give anyone else authority over his Church. What you are calling for is horrifying.

While Roys has done some very good work in exposing church scandals like those perpetrated by James MacDonald and Harvest Bible Chapel, her simmering feminism roared into full force after John MacArthur told Beth Moore to go home last year. Roys calls herself “complementarian,” as if the term has any real meaning anymore in terms of the roles of men and women in the Church, yet she consistently platforms theological liberals and women preachers (she’s admitted that being on the radio helps fulfill her desire to be a preacher). Most egregiously, she refuses to call women pastors out for their blatant violation of God’s Word.

Now she’s running short of MacDonald-like scandals (yes, Jerry Falwell Jr. is disgraced and Ravi Zacharias is dead), so she is trying to remain “relevant” on John MacArthur’s coattails.

My advice to her: Stop embarrassing yourself trying to slime a faithful preacher and man of God like John MacArthur, and perhaps study up a little bit on how much of a fraud the COVID-19 “pandemic” is.

Categories
News

Reckless Movie: More Theatrical Heresy on the Way

Paramount Pictures has acquired the rights to the theological trainwreck that is 2018’s Reckless Love by Cory Asbury. The movie will be produced by DeVon Franklin, who famously commercialized the heresy-promoting story of Colton Burpo going to heaven in the 2014 film Heaven is for Real. Franklin apparently has yet to meet a heresy he is unwilling to commercialize to gullible Christians.

The song Reckless Love is about an entirely different God than the one known through scripture. Asbury places God into a human-sized box, assigning the holy and perfect Creator of All Things human concerns and weaknesses. In a 2017 Facebook response to the criticism of his heretical song, Asbury wrote about God’s love:

He [God] is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn’t crafty or slick. It’s not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it’s quite childlike, and I might even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous.

I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit. He seriously called God’s actions childlike. This is a horrifyingly apostate version of God found nowhere in scripture. Instead, the Bible reveals a Sovereign God who is entirely concerned with the consequences of all His actions – namely the Glory of His Name. Reckless is not part of the equation. Cory Asbury’s God is something else entirely – the God of emotionally-driven commercialism.

It is no coincidence that the movie will focus on “the true love story behind [the] critically acclaimed Christian worship song,” since the song is nothing but a cheesy teenage love ballad sold to gullible would-be Christians desperate for warm fuzzies from boyfriend Jesus instead of Almighty Savior Jesus. Faithful believers should steer clear.

Categories
News

Project Veritas Exposes Michigan Post Office Corruption

On Wednesday night, James O’Keefe of Project Veritas released an interview from an unidentified postal worker in Michigan who claims he was instructed to violate election law in order to sway the 2020 election.

The unidentified worker claims to work as a mail carrier at the Barlow branch of the Traverse City post office, and claims his boss told he and his colleagues to seperate any ballots they found in outgoing mail from the rest of the mail in order to hand stamp them with November 3rd so they could still be counted in direct violation of Michigan election law, which stipulates that ballots must be received by the election clerk “before the close of the polls on election day (8 PM local time).

O’Keefe then attempts to call the post office supervisor at the Barlow branch to ask about the allegations and is promptly hung up on.

With mail carriers collecting any ballots and postmarking them fraudulently, the potential for election fraud is undeniable. This is not the first sign of deep and pervasive fraud related to yesterday’s election, and it certainly won’t be the last. See the video here:

https://protestia.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/2020-11-04-1.m4v