Canadian Court Rules the Public Must Fund Non-Binary Man’s RARE, INSANE and EXPERIMENTAL ‘Gender-Affirming’ Surgery
In yet another act of Canada’s perversity, the province of Ontario’s Divisional Court ruled 3-0 that their publicly funded health insurance plan MUST pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for a “transgender affirming” procedure for a man (Identified only as K.S.) wanting to receive a surgically created “vagina,” all the while keeping his penis.
K.S. uses she/her pronouns, mostly presents as female, and says he identifies as non-binary but does not align himself with the gender binary, which is why he wants both parts; or, in this case, a grotesque approximation of a vagina which is little more than a never-healing open wound. While these surgeries typically involve splitting open the penis and inverting it back into the body, this is something entirely new.
K.S. insists that getting a vaginoplasty without a penectomy would “validate” his non-binary identity, ensuring that the gender dysphoria he says he’s experienced since his teens would finally disappear.
This surgery is so experimental that it is not even offered in Canada, which has some of the world’s most advanced and lauded “transgender affirming care” hospitals and surgeons, but rather, the public would fund his surgery in Texas. According to the Globe and Mail:
(The Court) said the Charter of Rights protects the right to equality and security of the person, which includes autonomy and bodily integrity.
Interpreting the health insurance law to require transgender or non-binary people assigned male at birth “to remove their penis to receive state funding for a vaginoplasty would be inconsistent with the values of equality and security of the person,” Justice Davies wrote.
“Such an interpretation would force transgender, non-binary people like K.S. to choose between having a surgery [penectomy] they do not want and which does not align with their gender expression to get state funding, on the one hand, and not having gender-affirming surgery at all, on the other. Such a choice would reinforce their disadvantaged position and would not promote their dignity and autonomy.”
About Author
Hearing stories of what a Frankenstein horror show the normal bottom surgery is, this promises to be a disgusting nightmare that will surely ruin this guy forever. The godless, clueless, woke government healthcare system should be paying for mental help for this poor soul instead of facilitating experimental butchery.
I’m going to take a wild guess that you’ve never actually read Frankenstein?
If you support this godless idiocy, be a man and say so instead of (attempting) to attack me, dude. Go ahead, defend it.
Mary Shelley was just 19 when Frankenstein was published, and it’s a masterpiece.
I guess you just want big government to tell people how to act, liberal snowflake.
What, are you retarded? By every word I’ve ever written in comments on this site and all others, I’ve never said anything in support of ANYTHING liberal. I remain an Evangelical conservative, and you obviously remain….whatever.