SEBTS and Danny Akin Keeps Digging

A letter sent to the elders at First Baptist Church in Lindale by Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary president Danny Akin claims innocence for involved SEBTS faculty, including Karen Swallow Prior and Dean of Graduate Studies Keith Whitfield in the case of the leaked rough draft used to attempt to blackmail Pastor Tom Buck and his wife Jennifer. The letter was posted on Twitter by the Servants and Heralds @SBCUnderground account.

Unfortunately, rather than reveal the truth behind what has happened, the letter compounds the lies that have already been exposed.

Rather than explaining the disparity between Buck’s logical claim that they sent the rough draft to Prior for commentary and editing (not to be shared) and Prior’s claim that Tom and Jennifer wanted her to shop around their personal and painful story before it was finished, the letter makes laughably and illogical claims about what happened.

Notably, Akin quotes Prior who claims that “In 2018, Tom and Jennifer Buck asked me to help them publish an essay written by Jennifer…”

Why would Tom Buck – a notable pastor with plenty of direct contacts at major publications – need the help of a Liberty University English professor to publish an essay?

Prior refuses to divulge who she shared the “essay” (in reality a rough draft in need of significant editing) – a strange omission if her sharing was done innocently. Prior claims that she “was contacted a few weeks ago through my Provost, Keith Whitfield, and asked if…” Wait.

Prior is not hard to get a hold of. No publication trying to reach Prior to verify anything would need to go to Keith Whitfield.

Prior then states that she told Tom Buck she “would not share who had contacted” her because she “knew Keith was contacted anonymously to reach” her.

So instead of simply stating “we were asked anonymously,” Karen refuses to share that Keith Whitfield was involved at all. Again, if all of this was an innocent miscommunication, why did Karen cover up Keith Whitfield’s involvement?

Akin writes that Whitfield was “contacted anonymously.”

If this essay draft was sent to a bunch of publications, winding up in the hands of fake news Baptist News Global and SBC Voices, why would anyone need to contact Whitfield or Prior anonymously? And by text message? Who would happen to know Keith Whitfield’s cell phone number but be afraid to reveal their identity?

Akin later writes that “No SEBTS personnel were involved in responding to a request to verify the story.”

This is correct, mainly because the source of the leaked article was SEBTS professor Karen Swallow Prior, who could easily have put this to rest immediately by telling the Bucks (or the world since she is an avid Tweeter) that she mistakenly thought they wanted her to shop the article. The explanation wouldn’t have made a whole lot of sense since the Bucks wouldn’t have needed her help finding a place to publish the essay, but Prior could have maintained her innocent image and most people wouldn’t have been the wiser.

Instead, she went silent and hid behind Akin. Was this to cover up for herself? Or is it possible that Willie Rice advisor Keith Whitfield – receiver of anonymous texts – is the actual reason the draft just happened to fly all over the internet right at the moment Tom Buck brought his information about Jeff Ford to Willie?


Followers of this saga are supposed to accept that this “dirt” on a vocal SBC conservative with many enemies was floating around the internet for four years and nobody thought it was worthy of exploitation until 2022 when Buck happened to privately approach the SBC establishment candidate with a potentially politically damaging issue in his church. Then the draft just happens to enter the conversation.

We’re also supposed to believe that Todd Benkert of SBC Voices (clearly in the Bart Barber camp) just happened to contact Karen Swallow Prior regarding the draft, even though up to the point Benkert revealed his contact with KSP Tom Buck had not revealed her connection.

The manifest untruths are lining up, and the evidence of blackmail and conspiracy are being laid bare for the world to see. The only question that remains is, which liar will squeal first?


Enjoy our content? GREAT! Unfortunately, ad revenue for truth-telling websites has been severely hampered by censorship and de-platforming. This ministry isn't free to run, and finding people willing to support polemical theology is like trying to find a needle in a haystack.

So we have some great ways for you to EASILY support our work that will take less than 3 minutes of your time to do.
First, check our our page explaining this all at detail at

But in short, you can support us on Patreon and get exclusive rewards like the FULL non-truncated episodes of the bi-weely Polemics Report podcast ONLY available on your Patreon app. It's super easy to use. Get exclusive updates from JD. Get all that and support our work for only $5.95 a month. You'll also get a PAID subscription to 'The Insurgency' "banned news blasts" once a day for 50 news links to banned content you can't find in social media. For other patron tiers, you can join us live via zoom to interact with JD during the Bulldgomatic Bible study, get free theology books in the mail, and more.

Or, if you don't want to use Patreon and don't want the rewards, subscribe to 'The Insurgency' "banned news blasts" for free (three days a week) or $7 dollars a month (notice that's a dollar more than getting it through Patreon) or $70 dollars a year. Instead of you scouring the news, let our Gideon Knox News team do the news-hunting FOR YOU and it will save you time finding real news.

And finally, you can give a one time financial gift through Giving Fuel . It's also super-easy to set up and takes only minutes.

Because JD gets banned in Facebook a lot, you can also find him on Twitter here And if you're into politics, check out Montana Daily Gazette. If you just want his sermons, check out his SermonAudio feed

2 thoughts on “SEBTS and Danny Akin Keeps Digging

  1. Quite a dance there. She admits to sharing the essay with publications and distributing it supposedly at the Buck’s request (i.e., with implicit permission of the author), and then when contacted for verification supposedly decided, along with Whitfield, that it would be wrong to publish the essay without the permission of the author.

    Well, which is it Karen? Did you have permission or did you not?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *