Former OnlyFans Creator Preaches Christ To Hypocrites Laura Loomer and Pearl Davis
Former Onlyfans model-turned-repentant Christian Nala Ray has responded to vicious attacks from internet personality Laura Loomer, calling her out for her self-righteousness while proclaiming the good news instead.
For more on Nala Ray
OnlyFans Model making $330,000/month Turns to Christ, Deletes Account, Throws Out All Her Immodest Clothes
The Heart of Christ: Self-Righteous Karen Vs Only Fans Girl, Whose Side Are We On?
Former OnlyFans Creator Nala Ray Says She’s Not a Trinitarian+ Needs to Be Catechized Badly
Former OnlyFans Model Nala Ray Tells Protestia “I 100% believe in the Trinity”
Nine months ago, Laura Loomer, who is Jewish, wrote: “These OnlyFans girls can pray their slutty behavior away all they want. They will never be respectable no matter how much they cry to God. Praying to be a respectable person doesn’t work once you do sex work. It’s best that we shun women like this from society forever.”
This sentiment was picked up by Pearl Davis, who, like Loomer, has a foul heart as polluted as Ray’s bed once was, declaring that “once a sex worker, always a sex worker” and accused Ray of “crashing out.”
Ray’s response, however, is excellent.
Once again, another person is trying to act holier than I am when you are not even willing to put out your own personal details of your life, as in the things you struggled with, the shame that you’ve born because of the things that you have done in your life.”
I am fully well aware of all the things that I’m putting out on the internet because I want other people to see that like, hey listen: I could not take away my own sin. God sent his son to die on the cross, a perfect lamb, to cover the debt that I owed. That is as simple as it gets. A negative does not cancel out a positive. That is why God sent his son in human form to save us.”
Ray insists:
“I wear my shame on the outside. I am not afraid of others to literally see me for who I am. But the people like you, who continue to call me by my sin, is exactly what the devil does. So keep it up by all means, by all means.
I’m gonna continue spreading the word of God and what God did for me, I am in no way a prophet, a prophet, a disciple, I am just here to share the good news. The good news is what Christ did in my life by radically saving me.”
She offers some parting words for Loomer, and others:
So continue to judge. I don’t care. There are so many out there like you, Laura. So many. And I truly hope that one day you can find Christ. You can experience the love of God that I did at the level I did because none of us are perfect, absolutely none of us and least of all me.
So maybe that is why you’re judging me because you never did sex work, but believe it or not, that’s not the worst sin.
All sin is, is something that separates you from Christ. So go through your life really quick in your head before you get to judgment day and think about the things that you have done and said, even on social media, that have separated you from Christ. Because that is the scary part about it. Not judging me, you can judge me all you want. I do not care, my girl, I do not care. But take the plank out of your own eye before you try to help somebody with a plank in theirs. God bless.
About Author
Pearl is controlled opposition. She want to divide the sexes just as much as the feminists do, and shes just as loose. Laura Loomer has dirty bloomers as well. She lied about getting her tires slashed for Internet sorrow asspats, stalked and messaged a guy sexually, and even stalked a political opponents mother and used her against him in an article. these are from years ago so exact details are foggy, but that’s the basic gist.
https://youtu.be/rjSYBTMo6Io?feature=shared
Here’s the vid with some of the allegations against Laura Loomer. she has no room to piously moralize to anyone.
Pretty good response indeed. She’s still a baby Christian, and it shows, but the Gospel is the only good response, if any response is given at all, and she managed that fairly well enough. The main point being that the Lord does not redeem us back into fellowship, acceptance, inclusion, and good graces of the wicked world and a society that is at enmity with Him in the first place. Redemption and sanctification are not about regaining acceptance and inclusion in society. It’s about judgment day. It’s about eternity. It’s about being a witness. And she did a fairly good job of noting that fact. I believe it is still too soon to be able to adequately judge her fruit, but it’s clear to me that, unless she is being very well coached as part of a giant ruse, there is evidence of the work of the Holy Spirit, suggesting her salvation is indeed genuine. Though it would be much easier to convince others, and be a far more believable witness, if she were to give away all the money she received from her prior occupation. There are many very good reasons to suspect she may not be genuine. But to ignore the fact that the Lord can indeed change people, and to say “once a ____, always a ____”, which is directly contrary to the Gospel and sanctifying work of the Holy Spirit, (and has roots more in darwinism), is certainly not the way to go about it. As if what the wicked world thinks is of any significance in the first place. They rejected Jesus just the same, and He was without any sin at all.
When dealing with unbelievers, another approach is to respond with plain old logic, as the Apostles often did. For example, ask if it is truly their belief that people cannot change, then why are they themselves actively working to try to compel people to change? Their own actions and efforts betray that lack of sincerity. Since they are actively political on behalf of republicans, would they also agree to “once a democrat always a democrat”? If so, then why in the sam hill are they wasting their time? Right, first make them think. Then perhaps they’ll realize once a sinner always a sinner is true for all, and true for eternity, who reject Jesus. The response is still the Gospel, but you might take a different tact. It takes time.
Youtube just pushed on me a video of a Korean chick claiming to be a Christian who made a video saying Christian men should stop falling for the lies of pastors telling them to marry ex-prostitutes, and her reasoning is that the trauma that led the girl to prostitution is caused by a bad homelife, so she’ll be a bad wife. Makes sense to me. You can bring up Rehab, but Jewish society back then was a warmongering society and women were merely utilities for making babies and even lived in separate tents from their husbands (go re-read the story of Abraham) so the Jewish man who married Rehab the ex-harlot didn’t have to have much to do with her; its not like modern marriage, living in the same house, not to mention how she could be one of his many wives since they had polygammy. In a monogamous context, its nonsense to marry a woman who has been promiscuous. It shows you are NOT a man of God but a lusty whoremonger, is what it shows, if you marry a promiscuous woman. Better to be a monk than marry a whore, supposedly “ex” or otherwise. But if you disagree, enjoy your STDs.
Dave, that has nothing to do with whether or not she is truly saved and born again. As I said, it has nothing to do with whether or not one is welcomed back into society. And that includes whether or not she ever marries. We don’t escape earthly consequences. A man in prison may repent and be born again, but he still has to serve his time, and that will still remain on his earthly record.
I appreciate your concern for me, but I’m about old enough to be her grandfather. You apparently took my comments to mean something other than what was intended. The entire point being that whatever earthly consequences there may be, which indeed may be inescapable, it is eternal consequences that matter.
She may very well not ever find a good Christian husband. And if that’s the case, she needs to accept that consequence. As we all must accept the earthly consequences of our sins.
Just be sure you aren’t being a hypocrite. Right, if you want to judge people by the worst of their past sins, then you also will be judged by the worst of your past sins. If they’re identified by their worst sins, then so are you.
For the record, it’s absolutely possible that Ray is not genuinely saved and the other shoe will drop. It’s also possible that it is genuine and she is saved. Only time will tell. Her words here, however, are correct and true no matter what the future holds. I pray it’s genuine, because nothing is beyond Christ’s saving power, dirty bloomer Loomer and controlled opposition Davis included.
I don’t know how Laura Loomer (I’m noticing) fits into this, but Pearly Things is right in what little of her I’ve seen where she says Christian men shouldn’t be stupid enough to marry born again whores. Sorry, but past matters. Men who marry sexually promiscuous women, even on the basis that “well, she’s a Christian now; sure she was a porn star before, but now she’s a Christian” well Pearly Things is right that such men are retarded.
She’s correct in that, and I would agree with you. My problem is her going against marriage and the family in general even with a non promiscuous Christian woman. She wants men to check out entirely. Of course, the powers that be don’t care if men check out “with their pride intact” or whatever, they’re fine with that as long as the sexes are divided and families aren’t made, at least ones with fathers in the picture. My point was toward whether a formerly promiscuous woman can actually be truly repentant and saved. Yes they can, and if it’s genuine, then they would likely understand and accept that there are likely consequences for their pasts, including remaining unmarried and childless. God has every right to impose punishment in this life. I agree it’s unwise to marry a formerly promiscuous woman, but does it bar them from repentance, salvation, or heaven? No.
Tim, if I were a younger man, I wouldn’t marry any of the three of these women. One isn’t a Christian. The other is a fairly abusive busybody, condescending, and an irritating know-it-all. And the third hasn’t been a Christian long enough for the fruit to bear. I’d say if you were to ask with which one would you be the least miserable, it would be the OF girl, if she is indeed truly born again. She may find a good Christian man to marry her in another ten years or so. But probably not before, if I had to guess.
Agreed.
Also, baptism washes away sins (Act 22:16) not STDs. And you might not know it, but something as simple as one parent having a latent (dormant, not active) genital herpes can cause their baby to have a heart defect or other birth defects that will cause lots of hospital time and huge hospital bills and possibly the death of the child.
I agree.