Beth Allison Barr Suggests ‘Doxxed SBC Pastrix List’ Will Result in More Women Being Abused

Prominent progressive egalitarian Beth Allison Barr has found herself hip deep in hypocrisy after claiming that a list of women ‘pastors’ compiled by a Southern Baptist pastor is abusive ‘doxxing’ – virtue-twerking her outrage and disbelief at its very existence, despite praising it months before.

Three months ago, Pastor Mike Law of Arlington Baptist Church published a list of 170 SBC churches that have women serving as “pastors” in an effort to support a proposed SBC constitutional amendment to bar any Southern Baptist Convention Church from giving women the title of “pastor.”

At the time, Barr did not express any doubts or misgivings about the list, freely sharing it and saying that it gives her “hope” and that she’s “encouraged” by the women on it.

The list was pretty simple – use publicly available information posted to the church’s website showing the name and picture of the person in question. I.e., a screenshot from the ‘about us’ staff page.

Though Barr expressed no concerns about this list, once Mike Law’s amendment passed and the roles of women pastors were clarified to be not a thing, she pounced on a narrative that was quickly picked up by a cadre of keening harpies, including Beth Moore, Karen Swallow Prior, and other assorted flustered women and effete men. They insisted that these women pastors impastors had been deliberately doxxed with the intent to harass, abuse, and terrorize them.

Barr went as far as to suggest that because the list even exists, more women would remain silent in their physical, sexual, and psychological abuse, and therefore more likely to be subjected to it for greater lengths of time.

When one brave soul pointed out the obvious, that no one’s private information was revealed and that there is no way this constitutes doxxing, Barr wasn’t having any of it.

Of course, by her warped logic, simply posting a screenshot of her on her university’s website would count as doxxing. Actually, back that up. Her University doxxed her first! Are they TRYING to get her killed?

As many have pointed out, it’s puzzling that these women are surprised that if they put their name and picture on a publicly accessible church website, people can see it online.

Finally, Barr tells us what she really wants. She doesn’t want anyone to be able to prove that there’s a gaggle of lady preachers in the SBC, or to show documentation or concrete evidence when confronted. Rather, she wants a completely unverifiable number devoid of proof or buttressing information.

No one is harassing and targeting these women. This is not a hit list. Beth Moore and her merry band of theological marauders represent the worst kind of critic, and missives like these are emblematic of why she must stay home. Simply put, they have given themselves to neurotic hysterics when they suggest that the list intends to make the women accessible so that someone can attack and hurt them.

For Barr, the list was great until it was useful. ‘encouraging’ until it became rhetorically expedient that it wasn’t, and gave her ‘hope’ until she could frame it as a tool of hurt.

About Author

If you value journalism from a unapologetically Christian worldview, show your support by becoming a Protestia INSIDER today.
Become a patron at Patreon!

10 thoughts on “Beth Allison Barr Suggests ‘Doxxed SBC Pastrix List’ Will Result in More Women Being Abused

  1. My most recent pay test was for a 12-hour-per-week internet job for 9,500 dollars. For months, my sister’s friend has been making an average of 15,000, and she puts in about 20 hours every week. As soon as I gave it a try, I was shocked at how simple it was
    .
    .
    Do this instead———————————>>> https://salarycash710.blogspot.com/

  2. Now You can earn Up To from 99000 Bucks A Month! There are no limitations, Be Your Own Boss, it All depends on you And how much you bsd want to earn each day. This is a genuine and nhg guaranteed method for free to earn a huge sum of money at home. Join this right now…… https://incomejobz1.blogspot.com/

  3. Look here you crazy nut. God’s word does not have nefarious motives. Nor do you have the right to falsely accuse those who honor His word of having nefarious motives. It’s not about any power of men over women, it’s about God’s power and authority over us all.

    Show me someone, female or male, who rejects the parts of God’s word they do not like, thereby pridefully setting themselves up as having authority that belongs to the Lord, expecting everyone else to comply, and I’ll show you who’s really the one trying to unjustly leverage power over others.

    The wicked, disrespectful, extremely deceitful message being sent is that men and women who adhere to and honor God’s word are a threat to your safety specifically as a result of honoring God’s word. And therefore, that God’s word itself is a threat to your safety.

    You should be grateful that people are calling you “unhinged.” It’s giving you the benefit of the doubt. Given that this very simple concept hasn’t yet apparently sunk into your noggin, the alternative explanations are worse – such as, for example, a question begged, how someone with such weak reasoning could’ve ever legitimately earned a PhD.

  4. Should women be pastors? No. However, there is nothing wrong with a woman serving as a children’s minister. Is it all bout the term ‘pastor’? Semantics? I grew up Baptist and have seen women serve the children my whole life. Where is the grace? Besides, who cares about a denomination that pushes mRNA vaccines on its own missionary families who wish to keep their jobs? So glad I left this denomination, its liberal universities and it’s apostate direction. Soon it will look alot like the UMC. This whole issue of women in the church is nothing more than a smokescreen designed to appease the conservative elements within the SBC…all the while they abuse the money to promote apostate ideas and are making a fortune bringin in illegal aliens, etc, etc…… Pfui!

    1. You’re right about the whole semantics thing. “Pastor”, “deacon”, and “submission” are all words that become less clearly defined the longer people debate about them. The fact of the matter is that as English speakers, we are spoiled for choice when it comes to good translations and don’t have to be language scholars to know exactly the point God is trying to make when it comes to how He wants society, family, and the church structured. At this point, the debate over women “pastors” is incidental to the real debate which is: “will we obey what God has said in His word”.

  5. Should women be pastors? No. However, there is nothing wrong with a woman serving as a children’s minister. Is it all bout the term ‘pastor’? Semantics? I grew up Baptist and have seen women serve the children my whole life. Where is the grace? Besides, who cares about a denomination that pushes mRNA vaccines on its own missionary families who wish to keep their jobs? So glad I left this denomination, its liberal universities and it’s apostate direction. This whole issue of women in the church is nothing more than a smokescreen designed to appease the conservative elements within the SBC…all the while they abuse the money to promote apostate ideas and are making a fortune bringing in illegal aliens, etc, etc…… Pfui!

  6. Should women be pastors? No. However, there is nothing wrong with a woman serving as a children’s minister. Is it all bout the term ‘pastor’? Semantics? I grew up Baptist and have seen women serve the children my whole life. Where is the grace? Besides, who cares about a denomination that pushes mRNA vaccines on its own missionary families who wish to keep their jobs? So glad I left this denomination, its liberal universities and it’s apostate direction. This whole issue of women in the church serves as a smokescreen to appease the conservative elements within the SBC…all the while they abuse the money to promote apostate ideas and are making a fortune bringing in illegal aliens, etc, etc…… Pfui!

  7. “What you are doing is **about power**…”

    BAB focus on “power” reveals how she views the world in terms of who can impose their will on others. Things like the Bible and Complementarianism are just set pieces for her “desire to be over her husband” (or in this case men in general). To her, the issue of authority overshadows the “secondary issue” of men’s and women’s roles because she is more influenced by the world then she is by the Word.

    It is very amusing to see how, despite all the sermons about “servant leadership”, whenever rebellious women attempt to take on the role of pastor they express that role solely in terms of “power” and not “whoever wishes to become great among you shall be your servant”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *