Op-Ed: Was the Apostle Bartholomew Even Martyred? Myths that’ll Preach

Well-meaning people frequently give a well-known apologetic as evidence regarding the resurrection of Christ, usually during The Easter Sermon. Preachers, teachers, theologians, and laypeople point to the Apostles’ deaths as circumstantial evidence concerning that event. They say things like, “People will die for a cause if they believe it to be true, but they won’t die for a lie. The twelve Apostles suffered terrible deaths as martyrs for the cause- now why would they endure such profound suffering if they believed it a lie?”

It’s a given that almost all the Apostles were martyred and that their gruesome, grotesque end is known. People say things like “church tradition has it that……” or” church history tells us that….” and that seems to settle it. There is assumed confidence in the historicity of these accounts, supposing we have sufficient certainty of knowing what actually happened and recounting this to others without impunity.

Yet even a cursory examination of the accounts of the apostles’ deaths shows gaps, contradictions, conflicting testimony, unreliable witnesses, suspect testimonies, and incredible uncertainty. The whole thing is a complete mess, and. If someone says that church tradition says they all died a martyr’s death, ask them, which ones in particular they’re referring to and they would have no answer. It’s a good line, but it’s impossible to back up once you go deeper than surface-level sound clips.

To cite just one example, we offer the supposed martyrdom of Bartholomew the Apostle. Finding primary sources for the martyrdom of Bartholomew has been a nightmare. What we typically see is “some local traditions have him going to India. Other traditions record him as serving as a missionary in Ethiopia. Mesopotamia, Parthia, and Lycaonia”. In the NewAdvent entry on Barthlomew, we read without sources or citations:

“Other traditions represent St. Bartholomew as preaching in Mesopotamia, Persia, Egypt, Armenia, Lycaonia, Phrygia, and on the shores of the Black Sea. One legend, it is interesting to note, identifies him with Nathanael. The manner of his death, said to have occurred at Albanopolis in Armenia, is equally uncertain; according to some, he was beheaded, according to others, flayed alive and crucified, head downward, by order of Astyages, for having converted his brother, Polybius, King of Armenia.”

Here are all relevant and recent sources for the evidence of the martyrdom of just one of the Apostles:

1. The Biblical Evidence. There is no extant biblical evidence of the fate of Bartholomew. The Scriptures are wholly silent on the matter.

2. Hippolytus of Rome [170-235] Though in his own day he was co considered to be a very prolific writer, the details of his own life and his writings have generally all been forgotten and little is known about him. He wrote that “Bartholomew, again, preached to the Indians, to whom he also gave the Gospel according to Matthew, and was crucified with his head downward, and was buried in Allanum, a town of the great Armenia. Hippolytus. “On the Twelve Apostles of Christ.” Ante-Nicean Fathers, Vol. 5.

Hippolytus does not give us sources for this account; likewise, his authorship of said source is highly disputed. That is to say- we don’t even know if he actually wrote it. But if he did, it is also curious note that Hippolytus reports natural deaths for four of the twelve disciples (John, Matthew, Thaddeus, and Simon the Zealot), which would contradict Eusebius and others regarding other apostolic deaths.

3. Eusebius of Caesarea, [AD 263 – 339] Recounts only that Bartholomew went off to India. “Pantænus was one of these, and is said to have gone to India. It is reported that among persons there who knew of Christ, He found the Gospel, according to Matthew, which had anticipated his own arrival. For Bartholomew, one of the apostles, had preached to them, and left with them the writing of Matthew in the Hebrew language, which they had preserved till that time.” Eusebius.  Church History. Book V. Chapter 10.

4. Jerome. [ 347 – 420] In his commentary on Matthew he mentions a number of no-longer-extant apocryphal gospels, including a document entitled The Gospel of Bartholomew (sometimes called the Questions of Bartholomew.) This document is strongly Nestorian and was condemned as heretical by the Gelasian decree. The Questions of Bartholomew describes several conversations between Jesus and the Apostles regarding the crucifixion, Christ’s adventures in hell, and the resurrection. In the book, Jesus gives Bartholomew power and authority over the people and demons populating hell, which gives him the ability to question Satan about his battle with heaven. Written possibly as early as the 6th century, it does not cast light on his death.

5. There is a non-Biblical document called the “Martyrdom of Bartholomew” written as early as the 5th century, which claims that Bartholomew was martyred by King Astyages in Armenia:  “Then the King rent the purple in which he was clothed, and ordered the holy apostle Bartholomew to be beaten with rods; and after having been thus scourged, to be beheaded.”

Interestingly enough, in this book the demons are speaking amongst themselves about how to recognize him, and they give this description “And the demon answered and said: He has black hair, a shaggy head, a fair skin, large eyes, beautiful nostrils, his ears hidden by the hair of his head, with a yellow beard, a few grey hairs, of middle height, and neither tall nor stunted, but middling…His voice is like the sonnet of a strong trumpet; there go along with him angels of God, who allow him neither to be weary, nor to hunger, nor to thirst; his face, and his soul, and his heart are always glad and rejoicing; he foresees everything, he knows and speaks every tongue of every nation.”

6. Moses of Chorena, a writer who lived either in the late 5th century or sometime in the 7th century, wrote “There came then into Armenia the Apostle Bartholomew, who suffered martyrdom among us in the town of Arepan. As to Simon, who was sent unto Persia I cannot relate with certainty what he did, nor where he suffered martyrdom. It is said that one Simon, an apostle, was martyred at Veriospore. Is this true or why did the saint come to this place? I do not know I have only mentioned this circumstance that you may know I spare no pains to tell you all that is necessary.”  History of Armenia .  Section IX

7. The Acts of Phillip. A bizarre, mystical, Gnostic apocryphal late 4th century book. In a later addition to it we read “And the Savior said: O Philip, since you have forsaken this commandment of mine, not to render evil for evil,  for this reason you shall be debarred in the next world for forty years from being in the place of my promise: besides, this is the end of your departure from the body in this place; and Bartholomew has his lot in Lycaonia, and shall be crucified there; and Mariamne shall lay down her body in the river Jordan. Addition to the Acts of Phillip. Paragraph 52

8. Allegedly there is an old Roman Breviary which states “In Great Armenia Bartholomew led the king, Polymius, and his wife, in addition to twelve cities, to the Christian belief. These conversions very much enkindled the jealousy of the clergy there. The priests succeeded in stirring up the brother of King Polymius, Astyages, to such an anger that he gave the gruesome order to have Bartholomew skinned alive and then beheaded. In this martyrdom he gave his soul back to God.” We have not been able to locate any source for  it.

So here’s where we are; concerning the apostolic work of St. Bartholomew we have only unreliable and contradictory statements. The earliest accounts have been lost. The first that have been preserved originated between 450 and 550 in the eastern provinces of the Byzantine Empire with traces of Nestoriansim. His manner of deaths range from being beaten, beheaded, flayed, crucified, and a host of others ends. He is said to have died in dozens of different places and countries, and most of the information that supposedly sheds light on his death was written hundreds of years after his actual death, in unreliable, unbelievable, fantastical sources.

During the first several centuries after Christ, stories about him, the apostles, and their lives — not to mention writings on the meaning of Christ’s life, the duties of a Christian, and predictions about the end of the world — exploded into existence, and the adventures of Bartholomew consists entirely of that- stories, traditions, myths and legends.

That is just one of the Apostles. There are 11 more, and the majority of them have histories just as twisted and convoluted. While we have stronger and more solid evidence for the martyrdom of some of the other Apostles, the point we want to make stands; we don’t even know that Bartholomew was martyred. We don’t know how, why, where or even IF. We don’t with any certainty know a single detail about his death, other than that he indeed did die. Appeals to church history and church tradition are useless and confusing, and because we want to speak the truth, we need to be precise.

It’s fair to say something like “While we have a mess to sort our regarding which apostles died where how and why, its reasonable to conclude that many of them if not most of them probably were martyred for their faith”

It doesn’t have the impact that “They were all martyred for their faith and suffered this specific gruesome fate….” but the purpose is not maximum impact, but maximum truth so that God may be glorified.

Editor’s Note. This was adapted from an earlier 2013 essay,

About Author

Staff Writer

See author's posts

Appreciate our content? Take a second to join the fight with Protestia on Patreon!