Categories
News

Sojourner’s Article Promotes Kink, Polyamory, Non-Monogamy, And Casual Sex

Lest anyone was unsure just exactly how liberal and wicked Sojourners had become, the magazine and now website which was founded by theologian Jim Wallis and offers daily commentary and reporting from a progressive perspective, we’ve been given a pretty good idea.

While typically seen simply as a website/ movement that is economically leftist and socially centrist, talking about poverty, climate change, and student loan forgiveness from an evangelicalism perspective, Sojourners, or Sojo, is in actuality a cauldron of moral relativism and satanism. It is rife with op-eds from hellbound pagans embracing the wickedness of the culture while promulgating every sort of aberrant teaching unless the sun, particularly when it comes to LGBTQ issues, abortion, and sexual moral relativism.

Case in point: a recent article by Jennifer Martin. According to her bio:

“Jennifer C. Martin is a dirtbag Christian and a polyamorous writer living in Richmond, Va., with two of her three partners and two children. When she’s not trolling on social media, she enjoys baking, yoga, and gaming. She graduated from Lee University in 2009 and is now a member of the United Church of Christ.

Martin writes a book review of Washington Post columnist Christine Emba’s Rethinking Sex: A Provocation, where Emba argues that the trivializing of sex and a consent-only approach to it has been damaging to society, and instead it ought to be joyous, celebratory, and have certain boundaries. Emba is a former nondenominational evangelical who later converted to Catholicism, and argues that for sex to be healthy, it ought to affirm gender roles, reject casual sex, keep the kink to a bare minimum, if at all, be monogamous, and that there must be limitations on it.

SoJo author Martin basically rejects all of that. She disputes the notion that healthy sex has really any boundaries at all, writing “I don’t think we need limitations in order to have good sex” and “we ultimately differ on what constitutes healthy sex.” This is because Martin has given herself over to every form of wicked depravity, along with their cuckolded, effeminate husband/ partners. She writes in her review:

My sex education consisted of crass comparisons of my virginity to a “wrapped present” for my future spouse that would be forever lost if I chose to unwrap it, a pledge to stay chaste until marriage, and of course, a True Love Waits ring. While today’s schools may teach a still-inadequate sex education that focuses merely on safe sex and maybe consent, mine never did.

Today, I identify as a polyamorous Christian — or a Christian who happens to have multiple partners, including two who live with me and my children. To arrive here, I have had to re-examine the intersection of sex and faith and what it means to have ethical sex. I was raised in a fundamentalist Christian home and was expected to maintain my purity until marriage. I got engaged at 19, married at 20, and had two children by age 25. My attempts to live out traditional sexual ethics led me to oppress parts of me that often fell in love with other people, or parts of me that were attracted to other genders. Ultimately, my husband and I found love outside our marriage while still maintaining love inside our marriage. We did this while also maintaining our deeply held faith.

and

” For people who have been raised in a liberal, feminist, educated environment where they were made to feel as if having sex was no big deal and that casual sex was an expected part of dating, and later found all of this quite lacking, Emba’s book might be extraordinarily refreshing.

….(But) Emba’s book offers no examples of healthy open relationships, nor examples of people who actually enjoy what Emba refers to as “problematic” kinks, despite the fact that we do exist.…The way we think about sex certainly needs to change, but I don’t believe that it will change for the better if we take Emba’s advice to completely reject sexual liberation and continue to ignore our own sexual desires around non-monogamy, kink, same-sex couplings, or casual sex when there are people who are engaged in them in a consensual and healthy manner every single day.

The fact that Sojourners is promoting this rejection of monogamy and promotion of casual sex and kink shows how far they’ve come, and how far they’re likely to continue to fall.


h/t Juicy Ecumenism

Categories
Featured News Social Justice Wars

Jim Wallis Replaced as Sojourners Editor after Pulling Controversial Catholic Article

(Religion News) The progressive Christian magazine Sojourners has replaced founder and President Jim Wallis as editor in chief and announced a new policy of editorial independence from the organization’s advocacy work.

The decision came after weeks of turmoil over Wallis’ removal of an essay criticizing white supremacists within the Catholic Church, which led two staffers of color to resign from the magazine.

Wallis, a prominent progressive theologian and activist who has also written for RNS, will continue to serve as president of the Sojourners organization, the magazine announced Friday afternoon (Aug. 14). He had served as a leader at the magazine since its founding in 1971 as the Post-American. 

Sandi Villarreal, who had been the executive editor at Sojourners, has accepted the role of editor in chief. According to the statement, she has been promised editorial independence in overseeing Sojourner’s web and print publications.

The controversial essay, written by University of California Los Angeles lecturer Eric Martin, was published in the magazine’s August print issue under the title “Harboring a Culture of Hate” and online as “The Catholic Church has a Visible White-Power Faction.” 

On July 28, following backlash from Catholic leaders, Wallis removed the article from the site, saying it “made unwarranted insinuations and allegations against many Catholics.”

In three lengthy subsequent editor’s notes, he criticized Martin’s claim that U.S. bishops voted to reject language condemning swastikas, Confederate flags and nooses in their 2018 pastoral letter against racism. In fact, he wrote, the bishops’ letter does name nooses and swastikas as a “tragic indicator of rising racial and ethnic animus.”

The article has now been restored to the site with a correction about the bishop’s letter appended above it. The publication has also committed not to remove published articles from its site.

As the controversy played out online and within the organization, two associate web editors, Dhanya Addanki and Daniel José Camacho, publicly resigned from the publication.

Addanki said that the article’s removal plus “three years of experiencing this toxic environment” as a Dalit woman and woman of color pushed her to leave.

“I’m unable to continue my role here in good conscience,” Camacho said in a public 

To continue reading, click here


Editor’s note. This article was written by Aysha Khan and published at Religion News. Title changed by Pulpit & Pen