Categories
News

Bethel Chief Prophet says God made Adam ‘Male’ AND ‘Female’ + Adam ‘co-created Eve’

Kris Vallotton is the co-founder of the School of the Prophets and Senior Associate Leader of Bethel Church. In a recent post, we covered how in one 20-minute sermon, he went on a tear of theological fabrication, claiming that when Adam named the animals in the garden, he was “procreating” and co-creating” with God– and that we can do the same thing. 

Then he went on to teach some ‘little god theology’ by claiming we are made after the “God-kind.” Finally, he offers this truly bizarre interpretation of Genesis, saying that God made Adam both male and female and that Adam became ‘Just male’ only after God took the ‘female’ part of him out by creating Eve from his rib.

Even more brazenly, he claims that in the same way Adam’ procreated’ with God and helped ‘create’ the animals and their nature, he also ‘co-created’ Eve. He explains:

The first point I’d like to make in this conference really is that God made you after his kind and God made Adam– the word ‘Adam’ and the word ‘man,’ Hebrew word, It’s the same exact word. He made Adam, both male and female, as you know.

How many know God’s not a man? God’s both male and female, and if you oppress women, then you reduce the revelation of God. (unintelligible) Because God’s not a man, it took a man and a woman to demonstrate the revelation of who God is.

…Isn’t it interesting that Genesis 1, God said, ‘Let us make man look in our image, male and female, he made them’ and then chapter 2…God seems to like say, Okay, let me just go back and tell you exactly how I did this….How many know God created man and he created the animals from dirt?… it’s the reason why your DNA is so close to every other creature on earth, because God used the same raw materials.

I’d like to suggest that Adam wasn’t alone in (the garden) in the sense that there was no other Adams around, but then he was lonely. Follow me for a minute. I’m saying that God wasn’t looking for someone to procreate with, (when he named the animals who passed by him) God was looking for somebody to solve his loneliness with.

We continue:

Because Adam was made with a god-hole. And God came in the cool of the garden. In other words, when God was gone, Adam was alone. He didn’t have anybody who related to like he related to God. So what does God do about that? God puts Adam to sleep.

So the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon man, and he slept, and God took one of his ribs and closed up his flesh there, and the Lord God fashioned into a woman, the rib which you take you for the man, and God brought her to the man and the man said ‘this is now a bone of my bones and flesh, my flesh, she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of the man.'”

Where was the woman? She was taken out of the man. The woman was in the man. There’s a few men in here. You can’t get in touch with your feminine side, because you don’t have one. The woman was taken out of the man. So where was the woman? She was in the man.

So God took Adam and said, ‘Okay, here’s how I’m going to make sure you no longer feel lonely. I’m going to take you and I’m going to break you in half. I’m gonna take the feminine side of you, and I’m going to remove it from you’.

And when Adam woke up, I’d like to suggest that he immediately knew that something was missing because he was both male and female at one point. How do we know that? Because the woman was taken out of the man.

I‘d like to suggest that Genesis 1, ‘female’ is not the Genesis 2 woman. That Adam was both male and female, and the woman was taken out of the man, so now Adam needs the woman the same way he needs God. He’s not complete without her. When Adam wake up…and looks at the woman…he sees what he’s missing…because he used to have it.

Kris concludes by saying that Adam co-created the woman with God, in the same way he co-created the animals.

And immediately he goes, ‘this is bone of my bone, flesh of my flesh. She shall be called woman because she was taken out of a man,’ And then he begins to prophesy to her… I think that Adam was prophesying who will pursue who. And he begins to do what he did with the animals. He begins to prophesy, he begins to co-create with God the woman. And he’s saying that men will be the pursuer, the woman will be pursued, the woman was born to be adored, and he begins to prophesy about this other part of him.

Categories
News

Merriam-Webster Dictionary Definition of ‘Female’ now Includes ‘Males’ who ‘Identify’ as Opposite Sex

The dictionary definition of “female” has been changed by Merriam Webster to appease trans activists. Once defined as “adult human female,” the term now has a lengthy definition, including “having a gender identity that is the opposite of male.” Gender identity, or that “vibe,” or “internal feeling” of being a woman has now linguistically and definitionally been conflated with biological sex.

The two concepts, gender identity and biological sex, could not be more different, as the former refers to someone’s feelings of how they associate based on gender stereotypes, and the latter is a designation concerning reproduction. But for Merriam Webster’s Dictionary, the time has come to include males in the definition of females….To continue reading, click here.


Editors’ Note. This article was written by Libby Eamons and published at the Post Millennial.

Categories
Critical Race Theory Featured Heresies News

ERLC Writer Who Wrote Shocking Christmas Tweet Employs Women ‘Pastors’

On December 16, 2016 the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention (ERLC) published an article entitled “The Diversity in Our Christmas Story.”


This week, it was reshared via the ERLC Twitter feed. The article was penned by Casey B. Hough, whose Twitter profile lists him as the following:

Disciple, Husband of @hanelise, Father, PhD @NOBTS, Lead Pastor @CopperfChurch, Assistant Professor @Luther_Rice@ERLC Research Fellow, & @CenPasTheo Fellow

Dr. Hough’s article highlighted the genealogy of Jesus as listed in Matthew and pointed out that Jesus was a “Mixed-Race Savior”. Hough pointed out that several of Jesus’ distant female ancestors (Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba) were not Jewish women but various types of Canaanites. To Hough, this is somehow relevant to the Christmas story and should make us all think long hard about what the incarnation and the gospel can teach us about “diversity”. To Hough, the color of Jesus’ skin (I’m no geneticist but I think Canaanites and Hebrews were the same color) should make us consider the importance of “seeing color” in the Kingdom.

https://twitter.com/Deseret_Rat/status/1342573903273545734

Of course, Matthew includes the genealogy of Joseph and Jesus is not a genetic descendant of Joseph. Joseph was the adoptive father of the Lord. Jesus was born of a virgin and conceived by the Holy Spirit. I’m not a geneticist but I am a theologian. If races do in fact exist, the Holy Spirit doesn’t have one. I do not know if Mary had mixed race ancestry. Franky, I don’t care. She was culturally Jewish, as were Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, and Bathsheba.

But Ruth said, “Do not urge me to leave you or turn back from following you; for where you go, I will go, and where you lodge, I will lodge. Your people shall be my people, and your God, my God.

Ruth 1:16

As interesting as the subjects of genetics and cultural anthropology may be, these are not the subjects upon which I dwell at Christmastime. I dwell upon the incarnation itself. Jesus came to Earth and lived as a man so that he could bear my sin. This enabled me to be adopted into the family of God as his brother. Nothing about genetics brought me into the nation of Israel, it was all the grace of God. Racial differences, especially genetic ones, couldn’t be further from my mind.

This was not the case for Casey B. Hough. He took the opportunity granted to him by the ERLC to publish an article about “diversity” which claims that scriptures teaches a lesson about the importance of Jesus’ “mixed-race”. That’s the kind of thing you need a PhD to make up because normal pew-sitters just don’t manufacturer those kinds of absurdities. Of course, I don’t want to impugn higher theological education. Hough’s PhD is from New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary. I graduated from that institution and I don’t remember the school teaching me such stupid things. Neither did the school teach me that females could be pastors…and this is where to we get why Casey B. Hough needs to be fired from several jobs.

Hough has a female discipleship “pastor” and a female kids “pastor” on the leadership team at his church. Yet, the Baptist Faith and Message states:

A New Testament church of the Lord Jesus Christ is an autonomous local congregation of baptized believers, associated by covenant in the faith and fellowship of the gospel; observing the two ordinances of Christ, governed by His laws, exercising the gifts, rights, and privileges invested in them by His Word, and seeking to extend the gospel to the ends of the earth. Each congregation operates under the Lordship of Christ through democratic processes. In such a congregation each member is responsible and accountable to Christ as Lord. Its scriptural officers are pastors and deacons. While both men and women are gifted for service in the church, the office of pastor is limited to men as qualified by Scripture.

https://bfm.sbc.net/bfm2000/

Hough needs to be fired from his church. The Baptist Faith and Message, and, more importantly, the Scriptures are clear that women are not to be pastors. No man who believes and practices otherwise is qualified to lead a church as its pastor. Hough does. So, Copperfield Church should fire him.

Hough needs to be fired from the ERLC. It is a Southern Baptist Institution. Hough flouts the official Southern Baptist position on the church. So, the ERLC should fire him.

Hough needs to be fired from the faculty of Luther Rich College and Seminary. This is an institution which trains pastors. It’s doctrinal statement reads, ” Where consistent with the doctrinal and position statements, Luther Rice is committed to the Baptist Faith and Message.” Yet, Hough flouts it.

How did Hough graduate from a Southern Baptist school, get a job at a Southern Baptist Church, and find employment at a Southern Baptist entity (as well as an independent Baptist Seminary) while outright rejecting the teachings of Scripture and the Baptist Faith and Message?

It’s simple. Few leaders in the Southern Baptist Convention care about doctrinal integrity. More care about numbers, (diverse) money, and power. That’s how progressives like Hough become employed at the ERLC and publish stupid articles. I think the chances of Hough getting fired from any of the jobs listed above are slim to non. Listen, it’s not the exception for the ERLC to have stupid stuff like this is, it’s the rule. I could write a book about how progressive and unrepresentative of Southern Baptists the Convention’s leadership is. In fact, I did write a book. If you are a Southern Baptist, you pay for unqualified men and women to write dumb articles like the one Hough published…and you are in no position to fire him.

You are, however, in a position to fire the ERLC and the Southern Baptist Convention. Don’t give them another dime through your church…unless of course you like paying for lady “pastors” and ridiculous articles about Jesus’ genetics.


Editor’s note. This article was written by G. Seth Dunn and originally published at Pulpit and Pen, with this addendum below:

*Please note that the preceding is my personal opinion. It is not necessarily the opinion of any entity by which I am employed, any church at which I am a member, any church which I attend, or the educational institution at which I am enrolled. Any copyrighted material displayed or referenced is done under the doctrine of fair use.