Op-Ed: ‘Transgenderism’ Perversion is not Between their Legs, but Between their Ears

Understand that “transgenderism” shouldn’t be opposed on purely moral grounds, but on epistemological grounds. In other words, the controversy is over the nature – not of gender – but of objective reality. “Transgenderism” is designed to force you to lie about what you know to be reality. A man has never been a woman, is not now a woman, and can never become a woman – not just because God says so – but because objective reality says so. Science says so. Reason and logic say so.

No one – even the LGBTQXYZ – truly believe “transgenderism” exists. Yet, they desperately demand that you confess that it does, and join with them in demonizing those of us who refuse to speak that which we know to be untrue.

This phenomenon is really just an attempt at “transreality,” the notion that nothing is objectively real. It is epistemological nihilism, the attempt to remove reality as a concept from our thinking.

The LGBTQXYZ cabal would be just as happy for you to pronounce that black is white, or up is down, as to pronounce that male is female. Their perversion is not between their legs, but between their ears.

Ask yourself, “What does a world look like that has transitioned away from objective truth?” Ask, “What are the consequences of our culture being post-reality?”

The battle isn’t about gender, folks. It’s about your perception – and admission – of what is real or fake, true or untrue.

Caving on “transgenderism” – even and especially using preferred pronouns – is siding against that which objectively IS and siding with that which objectively IS NOT.

When the “transgender” controversy is understood in this light, then suddenly changing our speech to spare the fragile feelings of a few odd people seems like no good excuse to stand against objective truth and immutable reality.

Hurt feelings are worth the price of maintaining a foothold in what is objectively real, with a clear estimation of that which is objectively false. Therefore, I can’t call Bruce Jenner a woman simply because he’s a man. I can’t call Bruce Jenner a woman because I’m unprepared and unwilling to deny the existence of objective reality.

You’re not only giving up on morality to cater to the LGBTQXYZ on this issue, but you’re giving up on science, medicine, philosophy, logic, reason, and cognitive coherence.

By Pastor and Publisher JD Hall



A CALL TO ACTION

Bringing you discernment news and commentary from a biblical, polemical perspective means it is tough out there on social media. We’re constantly getting kneecapped and constrained by tech companies who find our fidelity to the scripture and pursuit of truth to be intolerable, resulting in our reach being severely throttled.

For this reason, we ask you please consider supporting us a few different ways. The first, by liking and following our new Facebook page, our home where we share new posts and interact with our members. The second, by following and retweeting our Twitter page. The third, by signing up for our newsletter below.

And last, through direct support. You can catch our free weekly episodes of the Polemics Report by subscribing at BTWN. If you like what you hear and desire to hear more, you can get the VIP full-length version for only $5.95 per month on Patreon. Also, you get other freebies for additional monthly pledges.

Subscribe to us on Patreon here and support our ministry.

God bless!


***
Stay informed. Subscribe Today.

When you subscribe, please add newsletter@pulpitandpen.org to your contacts to ensure that your newsletter doesn’t go into your spam folder.

Enter your email address below…





10 thoughts on “Op-Ed: ‘Transgenderism’ Perversion is not Between their Legs, but Between their Ears

  1. Maybe you transphobes need to read your bibles instead of thumping them. My neighbors are LGBTQ++. I stand with my neighbors over bigotry. So do most evangelicals. Unlike you right wing Nazis, we keep Jesus’s commandments. To love God and my neighbor. Those are the ONLY two commandments we even have to think about. All the law and the prophets are summed up in these two commandments.

    1. That’s funny because the last I checked the Nazis were a left-wing party just like all tyrannical regimes and ideological belief systems. Don’t you do any research?

      By the way, the actual Nazi party actually had quite a few homosexual members as part of the SA supervised by Ernst Rohm, at least until Hitler decided he was too much of a threat.

      1. That is true. The sexual immorality and perversion of the Nazis has been well documented. They embraced all forms of it. And they sought to impose it on the citizenry also – putting children in camps, etc.

        They were not Christians. They hated both Christians and Jews. They created “positive christianity” – a gnostic, darwinist, cult that excluded many parts of the Bible they did not like. They wanted to replace God with science. And that is no different than what Johnny is doing.

    2. You’re standing alright. You’re standing in support and celebration of a sinful abomination, against God Almighty. Worse, you’re here trying to coerce others into doing so. Worser still, you do so as society is trying to force others into doing so, in a manner little short of extortion.

      That is not love for the Lord your God. That is not submission to the Lord your God. That is defiance to the Lord your God. You are violating the first and foremost of those two commandments. The Bible tells us what it means to “love Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.” In verse 40, Jesus said “On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.” – they do not replace God’s other commandments or change what God has judged to be sin.

      God defines what love is. Love “Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; ” – 1 Cor. 13:6

    3. Let me ask you. By what authority do you seek to extort others into supporting a sinful abomination? And how is that coercion/extortion a manifestation of love?

      Friendship of the world is enmity with God. – James 4:4 “No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. ” – Matthew 6:24. You’re going to be hating or despising something, whatever you do. The question is whom you will serve, and what you will hate. Will you serve God and hate the things He hates? Or will you serve the world and be at enmity with Him?

    4. You are not loving someone to leave them in their sin, lostness, and confusion. That’s hatred. If you actually loved them you would help lead them out of that lost state, and encourage them to know peace and wholeness without mutilating their body, or pretending to be someone else. Try loving them the right way.

      It’s not “love” to force everyone else to play make-believe with you either. That’s just disrespect, and it’s bigoted towards people who know the difference between fantasy and reality.

  2. This seems appropriate to put here:

    “When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.”

    — Theodore Dalrymple

    1. You might want to take your own advice there bud. It has already been established that you share some of the same views as the Nazis. Therefore, by your own flawed logic, you are a Nazi.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *